The key is to set your NAS to use SMB 3.0 or later. I tried smb:// but macOS implementation of smb is a bit different and Synology would need to make modifications to DSM. A much better solution is to disable SMB1 on the Synology. The SMB (Server Message Block) protocol allows Windows, Mac, and Linux clients with SMB/CIFS support to access data stored on the Synology NAS. The real world observations matched that: long restores from time machine would timeout on afp midway and yet complete â¦ As storage two HDDs in BTRFS RAID1 were used, it does not make a difference though, because the tests are staged to hit almost always the cache on the server, so only the protocol performance counts. In addition, remote users should be able to securely access server documents via web browser. Synologyâs SMB implementation and recent macOS versions donât get along great and unfortunately itâs not improved any on Big Sur or with the DSM 7 beta. Synology NAS offer both AFP and SMB2, Mavericks always choose AFP. When I connect to my synology NAS I get a download speed of 14MB/s using SMB (server is set to allow SMB3 â¦ When switching over to smb the Synology NAS will rename files and folders with cryptic abbreviated names. This should not be a problem if your NAS is less than 5-6 years old, because SMB 3.0 was introduced in 2012. AFP Vs SMB 10 posts ... etc. Als Windows-Nutzer müssen Sie sich hingegen keine Gedanken machen, SMB ist dort seit mindestens 20 Jahren einfach mit an Bord. You change an advanced setting in SMB to say the Minimum SMB protocol is SMB2. You can back up from various source folders, including external USB drives, another Synology NAS, rsync servers, or from public cloud services like Google Drive or Synology C2, and protect your data against malicious attacks and encryption-based ransomware threats. Either get a better NAS (for AFP) or a newer OS (for SMB). Technically you canât just select a check box to disable it. Windows ®, macOS ® & Linux ®. This means that every user on an authenticated machine can access a specific share. NFS uses the host-based authentication system. Um SMB auch von Linux-basierten Systemen zu verwenden, empfiehlt sich ein Tool wie Samba. For a long time SMB was recommended over AFP for Mac users for stability reasons. There are three different ways to connect your Mac to your Synology NAS: SMB, AFS, and NFS. Your NAS might do the required bookkeeping for AFP in realtime instead of precomputed as intended, so AFP performance might be bad because of that. âDisableâ SMB1 on Synology. However SMB provides a user-based authentication. You can now access the files on the Synology. Ref: high performance NAS benchmark using AFP, SMP and NFS, in macOS Mojave. The hardware side of the server is based on an Dell mainboard wit a Intel i3-3220, so a fairly old 2 core / 4 threads CPU. This being said, my query is definitely about the Mac protocol as this is the native file protocol and definitely more stable than SMB version1, the version that Sonos seems to rely upon. So the Server Message Block (SMB) protocol is pretty much a generic common file system protocol whereas AFP (Apple File Protocol) is native to Apple and therefore the Mac. This means SMB1 is not used on the Synology. In our guide, we are going to use the screenshots from our Synology NAS. Centralize data protection on your Synology NAS, and follow the 3-2-1 backup strategy by having an extra copy offsite â backed by built-in applications. The real world observations matched that: long restores from time machine would timeout on afp midway and yet complete successfully with SMB. Derzeit bieten diese ihre Volumes rein per AFP â¦ Everything was tested over a lâ¦ SMB being open standard affords better implementation compared to AFP, where it has to be by necessity based on reverse engineering of the protocol. SMB. Since NFSv4 itâs possible to use a Kerberos server, which extends the authentication system. AFP: 34MB/sec read, 28MB/sec write In this case, AFP is much worse. Synology Hyper Backup is a reliable and multi-directional backup solution offering data deduplication and compression. and it is MUCH more reliable using AFP instead of SMB on my macs. Synology - AFP vs. SMB: Helmut Gaishauser: 8/6/13 5:41 AM: Werte Gemeinde! AFP is only sliighly slower than SMB there. Ich habe (derzeit) ein reines Mac Szenario mit diversen minis und MacBooks (alle OS X 10.8.4) und zwei Synology Diskstations. Enabling NFS and SMB in a Synology NAS (DSM) is done with a few clicks. DSM comes with comprehensive support of networking protocols â FTP, SMB2, SMB3 (encrypted), AFP, NFS, and WebDAV â and provides seamless file sharing across Windows ®, macOS ®, and Linux ® platforms. AFP: die Alternative für Apple-Anwender Link Aggregation increases the bandwidth of your DS220+ NAS by grouping multiple network interfaces and provides traffic failover to maintain connectivity in case the connection is down. Anyway, Apple recommends to use SMB for NAS in Big Sur (no longer offer AFP in server format, but still available in client format). Between these three options I would recommend SMB, as AFP is depreciated, and NFS is slow and more difficult to setup. In macOS High Sierra 10.13 and later, the default settings for browsing network folders such as Server Message Block (SMB) shares are ideal for most organizations and users. It also does NOT support the AES-NI extensions (which would increase the AES performance noticeably) the encryption happens completely in software instead. Ask Question ... You can attempt to force a specific connection protocol (such as SMB or AFP) by using a valid URL. I have seen so may threads on this but no definitive answer or solution. This is to do with the special characters afp supports in file naming and folder naming. The real world observations matched that: long restores from time machine would timeout on afp midway and yet complete successfully with SMB. The share is mounted via AFP, since AFP is faster and more reliable on the mac than SMB (and YES, I have tried all of the improvements I can find on the net regarding SMB, but AFP still works more seamlessly on the macs). Last I â¦ With the release of OS X 10.9 âMavericksâ, Apple fully supports both SMB2 and AFP. The catalogue is on the internal SSD and the referenced raw files are all located on a mounted share from a Synology NAS. But it should be similar in concept to NAS from other brands like QNAP and WD : Log into your NAS As long as the server you are connecting to allows the protocol you specify, the URL should work. AFP vs SMB not as clearcut anymore. So AFP is the best protocol for all Mac clients through OS X 10.8, SMB is the standard for Windows clients, and NFS is perfect between UNIX servers. Over Gb ethernet I get near local behavior for remote SMB shares. SMB is also available on Mac, PC, and Linux and therefore the most compatible for whatever your networking environment looks like. AFP performance has usually never been a problem at least since Panther. SMB being open standard affords better implementation compared to AFP, where it has to be by necessity based on reverse engineering of the protocol. Synology - AFP vs. SMB Showing 1-26 of 26 messages. SMB being open standard affords better implementation compared to AFP, where it has to be by necessity based on reverse engineering of the protocol. Synology has very good AFP support, which was what initially attracted me to them. If you would like to browse files on the Synology NAS via Windows Explorer or mount shared folders as network drives, please enable this option at Control Panel > File Services > SMB/AFP/NFS. But you can make adjustments to optimize SMB browsing in enterprise environments. Centralize data storage and backup, streamline file collaboration, optimize video management, and secure network deployment to facilitate data management. Synology DS220+ supports Link Aggregation and allows you to combine these two LAN ports.